Tagged: change RSS

  • mormongandhi 13:04 on July 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: change, don't ask, don't tell, , , , god's army, , , lesbians, LGBT, , , moroni, , reconciliation,   

    “don’t ask, don’t tell” in God’s army 

    The debate over gay marriage has been raging over the last few years, and culminated in a battle for electoral votes in California last year with the passing of Proposition 8. Mormons were especially active in that ‘war’, having mobilized many members of the LDS church in advocating on behalf of prop 8, in addition to securing financial resources in support of this new legislation that would strip future gay couples in California of their marital rights.

    For more information about the Church’s involvement in the Campaign for proposition 8, please check the following website: http://www.preservingmarriage.org

    The idea of “war” on behalf of Jesus Christ and in”defending the kingdom of God” comes at the fore of the appeal to action by Apostles in the LDS church broadcast in preparation of the campaign on proposition 8.

    .

    What came first?

    As a proponent of nonviolence, a married gay mormon, and as a citizen of Norway, where my husband and I enjoy the benefits of a gender-neutral marriage law, I have followed this period of intense debate in the United States and within the LDS church with great interest and emotion. What came first: my dissatisfaction with LDS church leaders and their avowed militarism, or my homosexuality being at odds with current mormon doctrine? This is the question a well-intentioned fellow mormon asked me recently. Here was my long reply to him:

    .

    it's time to tell

    .

    Homosexuality was not a reason enough to push me out of church. What vexed me most was the Church’s stance on the Afghanistan and the Iraq wars and their religious significance in a cultural context. Both wars occurred while I was studying peace in Bradford (the UK). I decided to write a paper on mormon nonviolence, the main gist of it being that religions have the potential for both violence and for peace, but circumstances and interpretation are elements that realize those potentials. When I first understood this, I got interested in explaining peace studies through the lenses of mormonism – which resulted recently in this website.

    .

    Gandhi and Captain Moroni

    As a kid I watched the movie “Gandhi” and my mother had always been a keen ‘anti-nephi-lehi’. I remember not being allowed to play with guns as a kid.  But when the day came that I was drafted in the military, I chose to go because I remembered an Ensign article about patriotism that I had read as a teenager that made me believe that love of country is a good thing… To be honest, I am a sensitive soul – I am one of those who teared up when I watched E.T. in fifth grade in school. I was teased and bullied throughout my teens, but always responded nonviolently (thanks to Gandhi). Except for the one time I went to my older sister, and identified my ‘tormentors’ to her. Let’s put it this way, they probably wished after having been confronted with her (my Captain Moroni) that they had never laid their hands on me.

    But after all those years being committed to nonviolence through believing the restored gospel of Christ, the irony is that I still ended up as a basic training military officer teaching three hundred young kids how to use guns (how christian of me). I spent two years in the military prior to my mission and although I learned a lot about good leadership and bad leadership in the army, I now wish I had learned in Church, already as a “sunbeam”, that the army was not a place for a peaceable follower of Christ. A young recruit pointed it out to me, and this was the most decisive conversation I have ever had.

    .

    Reconciling the irreconcilable

    My understanding of satyagraha and the process of me ‘coming out’ happened approximately at the same time. After my mission, I chose to go to a university where I could deal with my conflicting identities of being mormon and being gay. BYU would not have been a suitable place. Although solving my own issues was important, my choice of university was largely based on my longing for wanting to become a peacemaker. Again, BYU would have not been a suitable place.

    I had always had a passion for working for peace in the world, this probably also stemming from those mormon beliefs of mine that actually are Christian… I feel therefore that my homosexuality in my treatment of peace and war issues is largely irrelevant, as my longing for working for peace in the world predated my longing for sexual intimacy and for a marital companion. In fact, as I was learning to resolve conflicts through peaceful means, I also learned to reconcile what seemed at first irreconcilable and to bring into harmony what most mormons believe cannot be brought together…

    .

    Change what you are, not who you are

    What I learned in my professional training as a peacemaker is for me to first look at the root causes of a conflict, and also to value the importance of understanding how deep culture predetermines a lot of our behavior. So in a way, converting to satyagraha resulted in me understanding what I could change in my life and learn to accept and live with what I could not. In other words, I am able to change my beliefs, but I cannot change my biological coding.

    Many have tried before me to change who they are (gay), and the results have been dismal. Instead of focusing on what they actually can change, which is what they are (mormon). In short, it is easier for the LDS church to change its stance on homosexuality than it is for me to change my homosexuality. As much as it was easier for the LDS church to change its stance on blacks, than it was for the blacks to change their blackness. That’s why I laugh at the prospect of a Mormon telling me to change my lifestyle “choice” and sexual “identity”, when in fact he or she is the one with a lifestyle choice and identity much more changeable than mine – but I admit that for many, to change their beliefs seems to be such an insurmountable task.

    .

    The decisive factor

    In June 2006, I had moved in with my husband, and we visited a fellow gay member who had just been excommunicated for having ‘come out’ to his ward in testimony meeting. He was understandably devastated. For the first time I saw the violence that the LDS church had done to him – and realized that he was me and I was him. I could not go on being member of a Church that was so ‘violent’ against some of its most vulnerable members, its little ones. It is dangerous being an anti-nephi-lehi among young strippling warriors, when the anti-nephi-lehi is considered the enemy.

    .

    gay-soldier

    .

    My letter to the Bishop in 2006, although timed with my decision to get married to my man, was mainly addressing the violence that I had found in the gospel during my studies and that had been confirmed to me in my meeting with this poor wayfaring young man of grief. I finally came to my senses and realized that violence, be it direct, cultural or structural, was systemic in the Church and that knowingly or unknowingly, the LDS church was targeting its own minorities. Why this dangerous obsession with uniformity at a large scale, and what about the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in God’s army? I learned through peace studies and through the gospel of a latter day satyagraha that the way to fight evil is by resolving conflicts peacefully. Violence must be challenged, as violence is evil. Inner peace must also be achieved by peaceful means.

    For more information about gay mormons, please visit affirmation.org and ldsapology.org

     
  • mormongandhi 12:37 on May 22, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: change, changemaker, , ,   

    joseph smith and mahatma gandhi on change 

    Here is an article from January 2008 published on ‘Thoughts of a Seeker‘. It is definitely worth publishing here as well, as it is in harmony with the spirit of this site:

    mahatmagandhi

    “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” Mahatma Gandhi

    “A man filled with the love of God is not content with blessing his family alone, but ranges through the whole world, anxious to bless the whole human race.”Joseph Smith

    Continuing along the line of “what should we be doing?” I present these two quotes in tandem for reflection, one a call to action and the other offering proper motivation.

    So often, whether the topic is politics or organized religion, the sentiment is “me” and “them” (the institution). People expect their interaction with organized religion or government programs to be similar to a movie theatre with an audience sitting passively looking for all their needs to be satisfied by this world “out there.” In reality there is no screen, we are all actors in this great drama of life and the beauty and condemnation is that we all contribute to the script and storyline. Whether one wants to rewrite the script for their own life or the community at large the power is within the individual through conscious choice. For the individual the scriptural language calls it repentance, a turning away from a previous path realigned to goodness, light, and truth. In society it is expressed succinctly in the vision of Bill Drayton: “Everyone a Changemaker” (Bornstein).

    I love the second quote because of its test of sincerity but also because of the beauty of the refining nature, a natural consequence of the true love of God being internalized. I observe in our society that the consequence of increased religious devotion does not always lead to the natural consequence Joseph Smith describes. Increased religious devotion can lead to increased isolation, a stronger focus on personal salvation, personal attainment, with feel-good gestures to others up to the point when the benefits to the giver are satiated. While on the other extreme we find a group of people who care deeply for the poor, and sacrifice to make the world a better place yet they scoff the religiosity of believers and deny religion altogether. I believe the truth lies in the realm of Joseph Smith’s quote, that true religiosity, true love of God will naturally result in a sincere desire to uplift the entire human race, and that professions of faith minus that natural drive to uplift others is indeed hollow faith. But at the same time the do-gooders who deny the power behind their drive are at the least ungrateful, still tinged with a sense of pride, and sadly, I believe, missing out on a fuller and richer understanding of the purposes of life and meaning for spirit that drives them to do good.

    May we all be filled with that true love of God that drives us to a force for good.

     
  • mormongandhi 11:30 on May 20, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: change, culture, , , ,   

    seek to persuade all to become latter day satyagrahis

    The Apostle Dallin H. Oaks, the first among the twelve apostles to have served full-time in the Philippines, when reporting back to the global Church in one of his Conference addresses contrasts the Lord’s way with the world’s way, or in his own words, the culture of the gospel of Jesus Christ with the culture or traditions of every nation or people:

    ‘No group has a monopoly on virtue or immunity from the commandment to change. Present-day servants of the Lord do not attempt to make Filipinos or Asians or Africans into Americans. The Saviour invites all to come unto Him and His servants seek to persuade all – including Americans – to become Latter-day Saints. We say to all, give up your traditions and cultural practices that are contrary to the commandments of God and the culture of His gospel, and join with His people in building the Kingdom of God’. Is the Lord’s culture posited as an antithesis to cultural violence, meaning that Dallin H. Oaks thinks there is both good culture and culture gone bad? The culture cultivated by the Spirit of Christ presupposes a culture of peace, where we renounce war in absolute terms.

    sainthood nowadays is not what it used to be

    The apostle’s statement did not appear in a vacuum, but addresses a valid concern among members of the Church and also of those not of this fold. Dallin H. Oaks through his remarks provides some comfort and demonstrates an apostle’s sensitivity to the question or issue of culture (and therefore also potentially on the issue of cultural violence). It is clear that the LDS church has probably been reproached by many potential converts and also by non-American members of the Church, of having preached a gospel where the United States of America is believed to play a decisive, if not a divine role in the establishment of the Kingdom of God on earth and in the preparing for the coming of the Lord.

    There is no doubt that the USA has, ever since the fall of the Soviet Union, played a leading role in world affairs – but does that make their policies holy or their mission commissioned from on high? The right of might? The golden rule – who ever has the gold makes the rules? According to Dallin H. Oaks, also Americans must become Latter-day Saints – and the rest of us do not need to like basketball, to wear a business suit to go to church and/or to eat meat to ‘fit’ in with the gospel of Jesus. In the contrary, I would push it as far as to say that, all are invited to come unto the Prince of Peace and become latter day satyagrahis – we have to press forward: sainthood nowadays is not what it used to be.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel